Display results as :

Rechercher Advanced Search

Top posting users this month


Nature: Call for acid-bath stem-cell paper to be retracted(Nature STAP reprogramme stem cell )

Go down

Nature: Call for acid-bath stem-cell paper to be retracted(Nature STAP reprogramme stem cell )

Post  halala on Tue Mar 11, 2014 4:04 pm

Yet another good example of Bullshit Scientist.

Nature Blog New wrote:Call for acid-bath stem-cell paper to be retracted

10 Mar 2014 | 16:00 GMT | Posted by David Cyranoski | Category: Biology & Biotechnology, Ethics, stem cells

Less than 40 days after a team led by Haruko Obokata(小保方晴子) of the RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology in Kobe, Japan(日本理化研究所发育生物学研究中心), presented two stunning papers claiming a method of using a simple acid-bath method to reprogramme mature mammalian cells back to an embryonic state – so called STAP cells – researchers in Japan, including one of the paper’s co-authors, are calling for them to be retracted.

Within weeks of their January 30 publication, the paper was criticized for irregularities and apparent duplicated images. Numerous scientists also had difficulty reproducing the supposedly simple method. The team responded with the promise of corrections and a list of tips to help other scientists to reproduce the results.

Over the weekend, however, two more serious problems surfaced. The Nature paper was found to contain two images apparently duplicated from Obokata’s doctoral dissertation. Her thesis also reported experiments dealing with cells that were supposedly in an embryonic state, but the cells reported in the Nature paper were said to be derived from a different process in an altogether different experiment.

The revelation has led to a flurry of calls – including some from senior scientists in Japan – for the paper to be retracted.

Perhaps the most damning comes from Teruhiko Wakayama( 若山照彦), a cloning expert at Yamanashi University(山梨大学) and a corresponding author on one of the papers. Interviewed by NHK news, Wakayama said: “I have lost faith in the paper. Overall there are now just too many uncertainties about it. I think we have to wait for some confirmation.” Wakayama calls for an investigation of all the laboratory notebooks and data. He continues: “To check the legitimacy of the paper, we should retract it, prepare proper data and images, and then use those to demonstrate, with confidence, that the paper is correct.” Wakayama reportedly contacted all of the authors requesting that they agree to retract the paper. RIKEN says it is still investigating the case.

帖子数 : 99
金币(Coin) : 2580
注册日期 : 2012-08-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum